Thunder Client vs REST Client: VS Code API Testing Extensions Battle

Introduction

For developers who live in VS Code, testing APIs without leaving the editor is a game-changer. Two popular extensions have emerged as favorites for API testing directly within VS Code: Thunder Client and REST Client. Both eliminate the need to switch between your code editor and external API testing tools, but they take fundamentally different approaches to achieving this goal.

Thunder Client offers a GUI-based experience similar to Postman but embedded in VS Code, while REST Client takes a text-based approach where requests are written in .http or .rest files using a simple syntax. This guide provides an in-depth comparison to help you choose the right extension for your workflow.

Thunder Client: GUI-Powered API Testing

Overview

Thunder Client is a lightweight REST API client extension with a graphical user interface integrated into VS Code. It aims to provide Postman-like functionality without leaving your editor, emphasizing speed, simplicity, and minimal resource usage. For developers seeking alternatives to traditional API clients like Insomnia, Thunder Client offers a compelling editor-integrated option.

Key Features

Intuitive GUI Interface

• Sidebar panel with collections and environments
• Request/response viewer with syntax highlighting
• Visual environment variable management
• Activity tab for request history

Collections and Organization

Collections/
├── Authentication/
│   ├── Login
│   ├── Refresh Token
│   └── Logout
├── Users API/
│   ├── Get All Users
│   ├── Get User by ID
│   └── Create User
└── Posts API/

Environment Variables

{
  "local": {
    "baseUrl": "http://localhost:3000",
    "apiKey": "local-dev-key"
  },
  "production": {
    "baseUrl": "https://api.production.com",
    "apiKey": "{{SECRET_API_KEY}}"
  }
}

Testing Capabilities

// Tests Tab
json.items.length > 0
json.user.email contains "@example.com"
response.status == 200
response.time < 1000

Scripting Support

// Pre-Request Script
const timestamp = Date.now();
tc.setVar("timestamp", timestamp);
tc.setVar("signature", generateSignature(timestamp));

// Post-Request Script
const token = tc.response.json.access_token;
tc.setVar("authToken", token);
console.log("Token saved:", token);

Advantages of Thunder Client

1. Low Learning Curve

• Familiar GUI for Postman users
• No syntax to learn
• Point-and-click interface
• Visual feedback

2. Performance

• Lightweight (under 5MB)
• Fast request execution
• Minimal memory footprint
• Quick load times

3. Git-Friendly (Pro)

• Collections saved as JSON
• Environment variables in separate files
• Easy version control
• Team sharing via repository

4. Team Collaboration (Pro)

• Cloud sync for collections
• Shared environments
• Request history sync
• Role-based access

Limitations

• Some advanced features require Pro license ($5/month)
• GUI can be limiting for complex scenarios
• Less automation-friendly than text-based approaches
• Limited scriptlet capabilities compared to Postman

REST Client: Text-Based Simplicity

Overview

REST Client is a VS Code extension that allows you to send HTTP requests and view responses directly from .http or .rest files. It uses a simple, readable syntax that treats API requests as code, making it perfect for developers who prefer keyboard-driven workflows.

Key Features

Text-Based Request Definition

### Get All Users
GET https://api.example.com/users HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Bearer {{token}}
Content-Type: application/json

### Create New User
POST https://api.example.com/users HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
Authorization: Bearer {{token}}

{
  "name": "John Doe",
  "email": "john@example.com",
  "role": "developer"
}

### Update User
PUT https://api.example.com/users/{{userId}} HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
Authorization: Bearer {{token}}

{
  "name": "Jane Doe",
  "email": "jane@example.com"
}

Variable Support

@baseUrl = https://api.example.com
@token = eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9...
@userId = 123

### Using Variables
GET {{baseUrl}}/users/{{userId}} HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Bearer {{token}}

Environment Files

# http-client.env.json
{
  "local": {
    "baseUrl": "http://localhost:3000",
    "apiKey": "local-key"
  },
  "staging": {
    "baseUrl": "https://staging-api.example.com",
    "apiKey": "staging-key"
  },
  "production": {
    "baseUrl": "https://api.example.com",
    "apiKey": "prod-key"
  }
}

Request Chaining

### Login
# @name login
POST {{baseUrl}}/auth/login HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "username": "user@example.com",
  "password": "password123"
}

### Use Token from Login Response
@token = {{login.response.body.$.access_token}}

GET {{baseUrl}}/api/profile HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Bearer {{token}}

Dynamic Variables

### Request with Dynamic Values
POST {{baseUrl}}/api/events HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "timestamp": "{{$timestamp}}",
  "guid": "{{$guid}}",
  "randomInt": "{{$randomInt 1 100}}"
}

Advantages of REST Client

1. Completely Free

• No paid tiers or limitations
• All features available to everyone
• Open-source (MIT license)

2. Version Control Native

• .http files are plain text
• Easy to diff and merge
• Perfect for Git workflows
• Self-documenting API requests

3. Code-Like Workflow

• Keyboard-driven
• Syntax highlighting
• IntelliSense support
• Fits developer mental model

4. Lightweight

• Minimal UI overhead
• Text files only
• No additional dependencies
• Fast and responsive

5. Documentation as Code

### Authentication Endpoints

# Login endpoint
# Returns JWT token valid for 24 hours
POST {{baseUrl}}/auth/login HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "email": "user@example.com",
  "password": "secretPassword"
}

# Expected Response:
# {
#   "access_token": "jwt.token.here",
#   "refresh_token": "refresh.token.here",
#   "expires_in": 86400
# }

Limitations

• No GUI (some users prefer visual interfaces)
• Manual organization required
• No built-in test framework
• Limited scripting capabilities
• No response history viewer

Head-to-Head Comparison

Feature Comparison Table

Workflow Integration

Thunder Client Workflow

1. Open Thunder Client sidebar
2. Create new request via GUI
3. Fill in URL, headers, body using forms
4. Click "Send" button
5. View response in panel
6. Save to collection
7. Share via cloud sync or export

REST Client Workflow

1. Create/open .http file
2. Type request using HTTP syntax
3. Add comments for documentation
4. Click "Send Request" or use shortcut
5. View response in split editor
6. Commit .http file to Git
7. Team clones repository

Use Case Scenarios

When to Choose Thunder Client:

• You prefer GUI over text-based tools
• Coming from Postman and want similar experience
• Need built-in testing framework
• Want visual organization of requests
• Team collaboration features important
• Willing to pay for Pro features

When to Choose REST Client:

• You prefer keyboard-driven workflows
• Want requests versioned in Git naturally
• Need simple, lightweight solution
• Treat API requests as documentation
• Want completely free tool
• Comfortable with text-based approaches

Practical Examples

Example 1: Authentication Flow

Understanding authentication workflows is crucial for API testing mastery, and both extensions handle this common scenario effectively.

Thunder Client Approach:

Collection: Authentication
├── 1. Login (POST /auth/login)
│   Body: {"email": "{{email}}", "password": "{{password}}"}
│   Test: response.status == 200
│   Script: tc.setVar("token", tc.response.json.access_token)
├── 2. Get Profile (GET /profile)
│   Headers: Authorization: Bearer {{token}}
├── 3. Refresh Token (POST /auth/refresh)
    Body: {"refresh_token": "{{refresh_token}}"}

REST Client Approach:

@baseUrl = https://api.example.com
@email = user@example.com
@password = mypassword

### 1. Login
# @name login
POST {{baseUrl}}/auth/login HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "email": "{{email}}",
  "password": "{{password}}"
}

### 2. Get Profile (using token from login)
@token = {{login.response.body.$.access_token}}

GET {{baseUrl}}/profile HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Bearer {{token}}

### 3. Refresh Token
@refreshToken = {{login.response.body.$.refresh_token}}

POST {{baseUrl}}/auth/refresh HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "refresh_token": "{{refreshToken}}"
}

Example 2: CRUD Operations

Thunder Client:

• Create separate requests in GUI
• Group in “Users CRUD” collection
• Use environment variables for URLs
• Save responses for reference

REST Client:

@baseUrl = https://api.example.com/users
@token = Bearer xyz123

### Create User
# @name createUser
POST {{baseUrl}} HTTP/1.1
Authorization: {{token}}
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "name": "New User",
  "email": "new@example.com"
}

### Get Created User
@userId = {{createUser.response.body.$.id}}

GET {{baseUrl}}/{{userId}} HTTP/1.1
Authorization: {{token}}

### Update User
PUT {{baseUrl}}/{{userId}} HTTP/1.1
Authorization: {{token}}
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "name": "Updated Name"
}

### Delete User
DELETE {{baseUrl}}/{{userId}} HTTP/1.1
Authorization: {{token}}

Best Practices

Thunder Client Best Practices

1. Organize Collections Logically

API Testing/
├── 00-Setup/
│   └── Health Check
├── 01-Authentication/
├── 02-User Management/
├── 03-Content API/
└── 99-Cleanup/

2. Use Environment Variables Extensively

{
  "baseUrl": "{{BASE_URL}}",
  "apiKey": "{{API_KEY}}",
  "timeout": 5000
}

3. Write Tests for Critical Paths

json.status === "success"
response.time < 500
json.data.length > 0

REST Client Best Practices

1. Structure .http Files by Feature

api-requests/
├── auth.http
├── users.http
├── posts.http
└── admin.http

2. Add Comprehensive Comments

### User Registration
# Creates a new user account
# Required fields: email, password, name
# Returns: User object with ID and JWT token
POST {{baseUrl}}/register HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json

3. Use Named Requests for Chaining

# @name step1
POST {{baseUrl}}/step1

@result = {{step1.response.body.$.result}}

# @name step2
POST {{baseUrl}}/step2?result={{result}}

4. Leverage Environment Files

.
├── api.http (requests)
├── http-client.env.json (environments)
└── http-client.private.env.json (secrets, git-ignored)

Migration Strategies

From Postman to Thunder Client

1. Export Postman collection (v2.1 format)
2. Import into Thunder Client
3. Adjust environment variables
4. Test all requests
5. Set up Thunder Client Pro for team features (optional)

From Postman to REST Client

1. Export Postman collection
2. Convert to .http format (manual or tools)
3. Organize into feature-based files
4. Set up environment variables
5. Commit to Git repository
6. Share with team via repository

Between Thunder Client and REST Client

Thunder Client → REST Client:

1. Export Thunder Client collection (JSON)
2. Parse JSON and generate .http files
3. Extract variables to environment file
4. Test and validate

REST Client → Thunder Client:

1. Create new Thunder Client collection
2. Manually recreate requests (or write parser)
3. Import environment variables
4. Verify all requests work

Conclusion

Both Thunder Client and REST Client excel at bringing API testing into VS Code, but they cater to different preferences and workflows:

Choose Thunder Client if:

• You want a visual, GUI-based experience
• You’re migrating from Postman
• Built-in testing and scripting are important
• Team collaboration features add value
• You don’t mind paying for Pro features

Choose REST Client if:

• You prefer text-based, keyboard-driven workflows
• Version control of requests is critical
• You want a completely free solution
• Requests should double as documentation
• Simplicity and minimalism are priorities

Many developers actually use both: Thunder Client for interactive exploration and debugging, and REST Client for committed, version-controlled API request suites. The lightweight nature of both extensions means you can install both and use whichever fits the task at hand.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on your team’s workflow, preferences, and whether you value GUI convenience or text-based version control more highly. Try both and see which feels more natural in your daily development flow. For more tools that enhance your testing capabilities within your editor, explore our guide on IDE extensions for testers.